본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

CONSULTING

CIRS Group은 제품 및 원료에 대한 최고의 안전 규제대응 서비스를 제공합니다.

식품·사료

Updated on March 11, 2025

Introduction

“GRAS” is an acronym for Generally Recognized As Safe, which is an important food regulatory category in the United States. Simply speaking, if a substance is GRAS under the conditions of its intended use among qualified experts, it is excluded from the definition of a food additive and is not subject to the premarket approval requirements of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.

This means that a substance that has been concluded GRAS may be marketed for its intended use in food without FDA review or approval. It is, however, important to note that it is the use of a substance, rather than the substance itself, that is eligible for GRAS status.

Boasting widespread recognition internationally, GRAS has become a gateway for enterprises to access global markets.

Brief History of GRAS

The GRAS exclusion was introduced through the enactment of the 1958 Food Additives Amendment to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.

1952 to 1962: The FDA established a list of GRAS substances without conducting detailed scientific reviews (“the GRAS list”).

Additionally, the FDA would issue informal opinions to manufacturers who wrote to the agency requesting opinion letters regarding their own independent conclusions of GRAS status; however, such letters were later revoked by the agency.

Beginning in 1969, the FDA began systematic reviews of GRAS substances; if supported by the available data and information, the FDA, on its own initiative, affirmed the GRAS status of the substance through a rulemaking procedure.

Additionally, the FDA instituted a GRAS affirmation petition process through which an individual, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity could voluntarily petition the FDA to review the GRAS status of a substance. Such petitions, if successful would also result in the FDA affirming the GRAS status of the substance through a rulemaking procedure.

In 1997, due to the resource-intensive rulemaking process, the FDA proposed replacing the GRAS affirmation petition process with a voluntary GRAS notification procedure and established an interim pilot program.

In 1998, the FDA received its first GRAS notice under the interim pilot program for the proposed GRAS notification procedure, which referred to GRAS conclusions as “self-determinations of GRAS status.”

In 2016, after having filed more than 600 GRAS notices during the interim pilot program, the FDA finalized the rule for the voluntary GRAS notification program. At this time, the term “self-determination of GRAS status” was replaced with the term “independent conclusion of GRAS status.”

Types of GRAS Conclusions

The intended use of a substance in food may be GRAS through:

Experience based on common use in food prior to January 1, 1958, or

Scientific procedures.

GRAS through common use prior to January 1, 1958, requires generally available evidence of substantial history of consumption by significant numbers of consumers. It is rare for such documentation to exist.

GRAS through scientific procedures requires the same quantity and quality of scientific evidence as required to obtain approval of a food additive and that the scientific evidence is generally available to, and generally accepted by, qualified experts throughout the scientific community.

Independent Conclusion of GRAS Status

Independent Conclusions of GRAS status may be made by a “proponent” (i.e., an individual, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity) based on the views of experts qualified by training and experience to evaluate the safety of the substances directly or indirectly added to food that publicly available data, information, and methods establish that there is reasonable certainty that the substance is not harmful under the conditions of its intended use. A GRAS substance may be marketed based on an independent conclusion of GRAS status that remains with the proponent. The proponent may also choose to submit their GRAS conclusion to the FDA as a GRAS notice.

* Note: FDA will issue one of three potential response letters: 1) FDA has no questions regarding the notifier’s GRAS conclusion, 2) FDA concludes the notice does not provide a sufficient basis for a GRAS conclusion, or 3) at the notifier’s request, FDA ceased evaluation of the GRAS notice.

상세 내용 및 궁금하신 사항은 아래 담당자를 통해 문의해 주십시오.

  • 김서원 팀장
    TEL : 02-6347-8821 / E-mail : seowon.kim@cirs-group.com